ISF Death Clock

Start here
sparks
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2022 4:01 am

Re: ISF Death Clock

Post by sparks »

arthwollipot wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:58 pm
Admin wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:52 pmOf course, that makes belief in the conspiracy even dumber. We know conspiracies have happened, because they always get exposed, and the ones that have been exposed involved very few people. Things like JFK, the moon hoax and 9/11 conspiracies require that tens or hundreds of thousands of people never expose them.
I had quite a heated argument on another forum over whether a "conspiracy theory" stops being a "conspiracy theory" when the existence of the conspiracy is confirmed.
Doesn't the language insist that when a 'conspiracy theory' is exposed, it becomes just 'conspiracy' (fact)?
User avatar
arthwollipot
Posts: 689
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:20 pm

Re: ISF Death Clock

Post by arthwollipot »

sparks wrote: Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:38 am
arthwollipot wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:58 pm
Admin wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:52 pmOf course, that makes belief in the conspiracy even dumber. We know conspiracies have happened, because they always get exposed, and the ones that have been exposed involved very few people. Things like JFK, the moon hoax and 9/11 conspiracies require that tens or hundreds of thousands of people never expose them.
I had quite a heated argument on another forum over whether a "conspiracy theory" stops being a "conspiracy theory" when the existence of the conspiracy is confirmed.
Doesn't the language insist that when a 'conspiracy theory' is exposed, it becomes just 'conspiracy' (fact)?
That is what I was arguing, yes. I didn't quite get what the other side was getting at.
If you're not on edge, you're taking up too much space.
Post Reply