The Religion Thread

[President Bush]

musical interlude, the word ¨angels¨ is in it, so on topic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9czzlwMzBw

[stanky]

Sparks,
The notion that I don't have the brains to understand what you're saying is laughable.
As per links to science related stories, i do a lot of that. Must i provide evidence for the content of a youtube i didn't make? Can you find anything I've written as fact , for which evidence is lacking?

and surely you can't suggest that I've been the infantile name caller here, can you? I'm generally polite and tolerant. You're generally angry and insulting. If you ever added anything to the science here, i never saw it.

The 2 youtubes i made in haste and linked here in a recent thread were done to demonstrate phenomena that i've not seen else where. I do scientific experiments all the time. I've been paid to write on cement chemistry. And now i've put some science on this site several days ago, original stuff, on a youtube...and you'd rather respond to this petty crap? TA, too. He didn't even stop in at that thread to tell me that what i was showing, he did when he was three, or that it's fake or mundane. Nothing. So,

fuck off, eh?

[stanky]

musical interlude, the word ¨angels¨ is in it, so on topic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9czzlwMzBw

good one.
i was expecting the one from Montgomery, that starts with the best line,
"I am an old woman."

[President Bush]

y´all bitching at one another is ¨Far From Me¨.

[sparks]

y´all bitching at one another is ¨Far From Me¨.

Bitching at? No. Bitching because of? Yes.
This is what happens when I lose my resolve not to respond to stanky's lunacy. BTW stank, I watched your little youtube with the magnet and the shot. People knew all about the phenomenon a hundred plus years ago. Very sorry Professor, it's not new. Search it up on the webz. Magnetic Inductance first observed by Faraday in 1831. I must admit I didn't bother to watch the second of your videos as I took it for granted it would be as wasteful of time as the one I did see.

Here's a link btw. All about magnets for beginners.
https://science.howstuffworks.com/magnet.htm

And just in case you wish to pursue your experiments with magnets:
https://www.first4magnets.com/us/tech-c ... ions-i1402

And finally, yes I've called you lots of names in the past. I will not apologize as I feel you generally deserve them by way of your willful ignorance.

You do experiments all the time? Prove that. Not on youtube as that little slice of life does not constitute evidence. Show us instead your latest published write up in a peer reviewed journal.

You've written on the chemistry of cement? I'm sure we'd all like to read that. Where, pray tell, can one find that paper published?

Umkay?

[Admin]

As per links to science related stories, i do a lot of that. Must i provide evidence for the content of a youtube i didn't make?

No, it's even simpler than that. If it's real, there will be evidence other than YouTube, and that's what you need to post. Check out when I post links - I point to the scientific paper, or at the very least, articles that reference them.

Can you find anything I've written as fact , for which evidence is lacking?

Everything you've ever posted that makes a claim. I haven't ever seen you back up your statements with a link to actual evidence.

I've been paid to write on cement chemistry.

Oh go on, this will be fucking hilarious. I have a nephew with a PhD in Chemistry who designed the concrete/cement for NZ's tallest tower. What paper did you write?

I'd believe you've been paid to write in fresh cement - an article on it I seriously doubt. Unless it's some elementary school science that a teacher couldn't be bothered writing. Your grasp of any science is less than rudimentary as far as I can see from years of interaction.

The funniest one to me was some loopy idea you put forward at JREF and one of the actual scientists posting there said "It's not even wrong", which you took as badge of honour that it might be right.

Sadly, what he meant was that you were so outrageously wrong that it wasn't worth explaining it - it was infantile garbage.