musical interlude, the word ¨angels¨ is in it, so on topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9czzlwMzBw
The Religion Thread
Re: The Religion Thread
Sparks,
The notion that I don't have the brains to understand what you're saying is laughable.
As per links to science related stories, i do a lot of that. Must i provide evidence for the content of a youtube i didn't make? Can you find anything I've written as fact , for which evidence is lacking?
and surely you can't suggest that I've been the infantile name caller here, can you? I'm generally polite and tolerant. You're generally angry and insulting. If you ever added anything to the science here, i never saw it.
The 2 youtubes i made in haste and linked here in a recent thread were done to demonstrate phenomena that i've not seen else where. I do scientific experiments all the time. I've been paid to write on cement chemistry. And now i've put some science on this site several days ago, original stuff, on a youtube...and you'd rather respond to this petty crap? TA, too. He didn't even stop in at that thread to tell me that what i was showing, he did when he was three, or that it's fake or mundane. Nothing. So,
fuck off, eh?
The notion that I don't have the brains to understand what you're saying is laughable.
As per links to science related stories, i do a lot of that. Must i provide evidence for the content of a youtube i didn't make? Can you find anything I've written as fact , for which evidence is lacking?
and surely you can't suggest that I've been the infantile name caller here, can you? I'm generally polite and tolerant. You're generally angry and insulting. If you ever added anything to the science here, i never saw it.
The 2 youtubes i made in haste and linked here in a recent thread were done to demonstrate phenomena that i've not seen else where. I do scientific experiments all the time. I've been paid to write on cement chemistry. And now i've put some science on this site several days ago, original stuff, on a youtube...and you'd rather respond to this petty crap? TA, too. He didn't even stop in at that thread to tell me that what i was showing, he did when he was three, or that it's fake or mundane. Nothing. So,
fuck off, eh?
Re: The Religion Thread
good one.President Bush wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:31 pm musical interlude, the word ¨angels¨ is in it, so on topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9czzlwMzBw
i was expecting the one from Montgomery, that starts with the best line,
"I am an old woman."
-
President Bush
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 3:05 am
Re: The Religion Thread
y´all bitching at one another is ¨Far From Me¨.
Re: The Religion Thread
Bitching at? No. Bitching because of? Yes.
This is what happens when I lose my resolve not to respond to stanky's lunacy. BTW stank, I watched your little youtube with the magnet and the shot. People knew all about the phenomenon a hundred plus years ago. Very sorry Professor, it's not new. Search it up on the webz. Magnetic Inductance first observed by Faraday in 1831. I must admit I didn't bother to watch the second of your videos as I took it for granted it would be as wasteful of time as the one I did see.
Here's a link btw. All about magnets for beginners.
https://science.howstuffworks.com/magnet.htm
And just in case you wish to pursue your experiments with magnets:
https://www.first4magnets.com/us/tech-c ... ions-i1402
And finally, yes I've called you lots of names in the past. I will not apologize as I feel you generally deserve them by way of your willful ignorance.
You do experiments all the time? Prove that. Not on youtube as that little slice of life does not constitute evidence. Show us instead your latest published write up in a peer reviewed journal.
You've written on the chemistry of cement? I'm sure we'd all like to read that. Where, pray tell, can one find that paper published?
Umkay?
Re: The Religion Thread
No, it's even simpler than that. If it's real, there will be evidence other than YouTube, and that's what you need to post. Check out when I post links - I point to the scientific paper, or at the very least, articles that reference them.
Everything you've ever posted that makes a claim. I haven't ever seen you back up your statements with a link to actual evidence.
Oh go on, this will be fucking hilarious. I have a nephew with a PhD in Chemistry who designed the concrete/cement for NZ's tallest tower. What paper did you write?
I'd believe you've been paid to write in fresh cement - an article on it I seriously doubt. Unless it's some elementary school science that a teacher couldn't be bothered writing. Your grasp of any science is less than rudimentary as far as I can see from years of interaction.
The funniest one to me was some loopy idea you put forward at JREF and one of the actual scientists posting there said "It's not even wrong", which you took as badge of honour that it might be right.
Sadly, what he meant was that you were so outrageously wrong that it wasn't worth explaining it - it was infantile garbage.
Re: The Religion Thread
Weird choice for more insult. Complexity was a math geek at jref. If you knew anything about it or him or me, you'd know were friends. My hypothesis was interesting to him and has since been echoed elsewhere.
Linking you to stuff I've written is more than the exposure i want. Plus you're being an asshole. Bragging isn't my thing. I've been written about in several publications. I've also written for several. I was on the cover of a magazine with 2 mil subscribers. Fancy that.
Sparks, your snide response to the you-tube i made about induction went over your shriveled head. There's probably 3 things you've never seen or heard of there. The initial magnetic attraction arrangements; the tentacles of connection and the fractal nature of the field. The use of b-b's with a back light is unique. I doubt you've seen the wild geometric forms, lurking in the spaces between the balls. I seriously doubt if you knew that one could do what is shown in the 2nd one and i'm certain you can't explain it. You're too busy being a bloated dick to bother looking.
so, cancel me, i guess? Easier than learning something new. This assassination you're trying stems from my unwillingness to go along with them and us, politically. I've also exposed the religious thinking you succumb to, in the name of science. You're stuck in the old days. I'm exploring magnetic fields and breeding endangered amphibians.
TA has run aground. Narcissism alone won't keep you relevant. Your evidence is always crap. Corruption has invaded science to a large degree. It's an issue you've missed, but you're exemplary in exposing it, ironically.
Feels gross to me that you've decided to do this. The slander is real shit.
I'm not leaving in defeat. More like disgust.
Linking you to stuff I've written is more than the exposure i want. Plus you're being an asshole. Bragging isn't my thing. I've been written about in several publications. I've also written for several. I was on the cover of a magazine with 2 mil subscribers. Fancy that.
Sparks, your snide response to the you-tube i made about induction went over your shriveled head. There's probably 3 things you've never seen or heard of there. The initial magnetic attraction arrangements; the tentacles of connection and the fractal nature of the field. The use of b-b's with a back light is unique. I doubt you've seen the wild geometric forms, lurking in the spaces between the balls. I seriously doubt if you knew that one could do what is shown in the 2nd one and i'm certain you can't explain it. You're too busy being a bloated dick to bother looking.
so, cancel me, i guess? Easier than learning something new. This assassination you're trying stems from my unwillingness to go along with them and us, politically. I've also exposed the religious thinking you succumb to, in the name of science. You're stuck in the old days. I'm exploring magnetic fields and breeding endangered amphibians.
TA has run aground. Narcissism alone won't keep you relevant. Your evidence is always crap. Corruption has invaded science to a large degree. It's an issue you've missed, but you're exemplary in exposing it, ironically.
Feels gross to me that you've decided to do this. The slander is real shit.
I'm not leaving in defeat. More like disgust.
Re: The Religion Thread
I don't recall anyone asking you to leave the forum. I recall asking you if you weren't having any fun here, why hang around. But as anyone can plainly see, that is not asking one to leave, let alone forcing them out as you seem to imply.
True, I don't know everything there is to know about magnetism. I freely admit that I don't have the math and physics skills. You claim to know much more. OK, I'd like to know too. Show me your superior knowledge and the goddamned evidence that makes you think you have superior knowledge please. You claim many things in that last post and once again refuse to back any of them up with evidence. You've written for several publications of wide readership. Name them please. You've been written up yourself in several publications. Name them please. But no. Not one goddamned scrap.
That is the debate here. It always has been with you.
I wish you the best of luck. But until you provide evidence, I will not buy into your claims just because you say so. That would go directly against the scientific method which evidence proves time and again works really well. And may I be the first to say your excuse of not wanting more exposure is just about the lamest thing you've come up with to date.
It occurs to me that it's just possible you may be the biggest pathological liar since President elect Mango Asshat.
How's it working out for ya?
True, I don't know everything there is to know about magnetism. I freely admit that I don't have the math and physics skills. You claim to know much more. OK, I'd like to know too. Show me your superior knowledge and the goddamned evidence that makes you think you have superior knowledge please. You claim many things in that last post and once again refuse to back any of them up with evidence. You've written for several publications of wide readership. Name them please. You've been written up yourself in several publications. Name them please. But no. Not one goddamned scrap.
That is the debate here. It always has been with you.
I wish you the best of luck. But until you provide evidence, I will not buy into your claims just because you say so. That would go directly against the scientific method which evidence proves time and again works really well. And may I be the first to say your excuse of not wanting more exposure is just about the lamest thing you've come up with to date.
It occurs to me that it's just possible you may be the biggest pathological liar since President elect Mango Asshat.
How's it working out for ya?
Re: The Religion Thread
Srsly?
You're worried about exposure on a page of the internet nobody visits and doesn't even appear in searches?
I call bullshit yet again. It's the simplest thing in the world to provide evidence for claims, yet you never do.
Ho hum.
Re: The Religion Thread
You 2 sound quite certain that i'm a fraud. That you're wrong is not the shitty part...it's that you've concocted a fable. Anonymity is a feature of all the forums i've written in. Now this?
Sparks, if you pm me your email address, i'll send plenty of evidence. I've asked before. You wanted evidence of a swing i'd put up. I had it. Never heard from you.
How about the library of congress # of my masonry book?
Or the date of the magazine that put me on the cover?
there is nothing for me in this. you'll still be dicks. i'll still be me.
you should change the sign on the door.
Sparks, if you pm me your email address, i'll send plenty of evidence. I've asked before. You wanted evidence of a swing i'd put up. I had it. Never heard from you.
How about the library of congress # of my masonry book?
Or the date of the magazine that put me on the cover?
there is nothing for me in this. you'll still be dicks. i'll still be me.
you should change the sign on the door.