trump off the CO ballot

[Admin]

I share your hope that what you say comes to pass.

It's been a funny few weeks since Kamala took over - a huge boost them not much, according to polling.

The problem is, normal polling isn't matched to life in 2024, when almost no young voters answer calls from people they don't know, and that's in spades for young chicks, so the pollsters have missed Kamala's most-overwhelming support and that's where she's going to wipe the floor with the crook.

I can't wait to go and rub it in the noses of his cocksucking supports at SC. Guys like Ed, DrX and Wildcat will be spewing their cornflakes - like Trump, the idea that a black female is going to run your country is the worst disaster they can imagine.

Next election, there will be a whole lot fewer of them and and a lot more of the young female voter demographic.

Now, Kamala just has to stick to her guns and not allow the old farts in the party to stop her actually instituting real change.

[arthwollipot]

I remember Wildcat. If it's the same Wildcat, we exchanged some interesting words some years back about guns.

[President Bush]

I share your hope that what you say comes to pass.

It's been a funny few weeks since Kamala took over - a huge boost them not much, according to polling.

The problem is, normal polling isn't matched to life in 2024, when almost no young voters answer calls from people they don't know, and that's in spades for young chicks, so the pollsters have missed Kamala's most-overwhelming support and that's where she's going to wipe the floor with the crook.

I can't wait to go and rub it in the noses of his cocksucking supports at SC. Guys like Ed, DrX and Wildcat will be spewing their cornflakes - like Trump, the idea that a black female is going to run your country is the worst disaster they can imagine.

Next election, there will be a whole lot fewer of them and and a lot more of the young female voter demographic.

Now, Kamala just has to stick to her guns and not allow the old farts in the party to stop her actually instituting real change.

SC politics are always good for a laugh.

I'd been looking forward to being 9000 km away from the US for this but it may be more interesting to be here to see what's going on first hand.

Health news: so far so good.

[sparks]

The first thing I almost always do upon logging in at SC is to 'Mark As Read' the entire Politics and Social Issues forum. It's all about what people believe without evidence or facts. It's worthless.

There is a touch of comedic relief there and that's the only thing that keeps me looking.

Wildcat. Now there's a waste of human potential. On permanent ignore.

Welcome back Prez and continued good luck with the health stuff.

[Admin]

I remember Wildcat. If it's the same Wildcat, we exchanged some interesting words some years back about guns.

It's definitely the same one.

He carries a 9mm in his pocket.

America, home of the brave.

[Admin]

Health news: so far so good.

Excellent. That's a lot more important than the election.

[stanky]

Dreamy stuff, but meaningless. Our new habit of spewing toxic and novel chemicals all over everything is what brought us cancer. Vaccine's gonna clear out all that poison from what we eat and drink and breathe?

Idiotically, and predictably, conflating two unrelated subjects.

What the fuck does it even mean, to save billions of lives. Save for what? For how long? How does that work?

Simple arithmetic - I'm not surprised it's beyond you.

10 million people die from cancer every year. If they're not dying from cancer, they will have had their lives extended.

Any magic thinking involved? What should people die from? Not die? Then go to Jupiter's moons?

It's nice of you to confirm you don't understand the simplest concept. Of course they'll die, but they'll die later than they would have.

I'm sure you'd much rather have 6-year-olds dying from leukemia and 30-year-olds dying from bowel cancer and not giving them such dangerous chemicals.

And what's not to get, about concern for corruption, in the hands of companies that haven't earned any trust?
Or coupled with a corrupt government.
A mandatory vaccine, if there were evil people, would be the greatest way ever to manipulate a populace.
It needs extra protection... like a nuke arsenal.
You're parroting propaganda, not thinking critically. Being a zealot for something not thought out; being a chump.

I'm even going to dignify that shit with an answer. It's pathetic.

But that's nothing against vaccines in general. I'm a fan. But not that last one. Or the pandemic.

Lack of understanding noted.

What the vaccine is claiming to do is based on a hypothetical scenario. It will keep you from hospitalization. How would we know that?

Because some of us can do maths.

The difference in mortality pre- and post-vaccine is so glaringly obvious even a moron would recognise it. It says a lot about your inbuilt bias that you fail to see it.

It'l keep us safe from tiger attacks.

It's sad that I'm not surprised you'd make such an idiotic statement. I had some respect for you at one stage.

How long can you dodge the lab leak?

Nice to see you're so far down the rabbit-hole you now consider it factual that it was a lab leak in spite of enormous evidence to the contrary. Again, my surprise is completely absent.

It didn't do what vaccines are supposed to do. But keep taking it anyway?

Au contraire, it did exactly what it was supposed to do. Deaths among vaccinated people are almost non-existent.

When does it get absurd? Boosters every month?

Six months is fine. Please don't waste medical resources by getting them yourself.

Dreamy stuff, but meaningless. Our new habit of spewing toxic and novel chemicals all over everything is what brought us cancer. Vaccine's gonna clear out all that poison from what we eat and drink and breathe?

Idiotically, and predictably, conflating two unrelated subjects.

What the fuck does it even mean, to save billions of lives. Save for what? For how long? How does that work?

Simple arithmetic - I'm not surprised it's beyond you.

10 million people die from cancer every year. If they're not dying from cancer, they will have had their lives extended.

Any magic thinking involved? What should people die from? Not die? Then go to Jupiter's moons?

It's nice of you to confirm you don't understand the simplest concept. Of course they'll die, but they'll die later than they would have.

I'm sure you'd much rather have 6-year-olds dying from leukemia and 30-year-olds dying from bowel cancer and not giving them such dangerous chemicals.

And what's not to get, about concern for corruption, in the hands of companies that haven't earned any trust?
Or coupled with a corrupt government.
A mandatory vaccine, if there were evil people, would be the greatest way ever to manipulate a populace.
It needs extra protection... like a nuke arsenal.
You're parroting propaganda, not thinking critically. Being a zealot for something not thought out; being a chump.

I'm even going to dignify that shit with an answer. It's pathetic.

But that's nothing against vaccines in general. I'm a fan. But not that last one. Or the pandemic.

Lack of understanding noted.

What the vaccine is claiming to do is based on a hypothetical scenario. It will keep you from hospitalization. How would we know that?

Because some of us can do maths.

The difference in mortality pre- and post-vaccine is so glaringly obvious even a moron would recognise it. It says a lot about your inbuilt bias that you fail to see it.

It'l keep us safe from tiger attacks.

It's sad that I'm not surprised you'd make such an idiotic statement. I had some respect for you at one stage.

How long can you dodge the lab leak?

Nice to see you're so far down the rabbit-hole you now consider it factual that it was a lab leak in spite of enormous evidence to the contrary. Again, my surprise is completely absent.

It didn't do what vaccines are supposed to do. But keep taking it anyway?

Au contraire, it did exactly what it was supposed to do. Deaths among vaccinated people are almost non-existent.

When does it get absurd? Boosters every month?

Six months is fine. Please don't waste medical resources by getting them yourself.

Predictable retort. The parroted and repeated talking points from whatever mainstream pablum you consume, with the usual grade school insults. What i don't get is the fierce loyalty to something that's recently concocted.
It's not about science, that's for sure.
You'll simply ignore any data that threatens your position. And now, to try to understand why so many have been turned off to this disease and it's prophylactic treatments, you can only blame their stupidity. No issues with the pandemic? Or the altered promises and expectations? Oops, didn't stop the spread; oops, didn't give immunity. Now, a life time of boosters? And squelch any talk of alternatives, like fitness and vit d3 &k; weight loss, etc.

It helped old an infirm move along. Natural immunity ignored. Malpractice, really. Advising a healthy young person who's been infected prior, to take the shot...insane. To protect others? B.S.
I took it, btw. 3 times. My doubts are specific to this one case. It began when I tried to learn more about it, and found fog screens and voices of any opposition, silenced. Creepy shit. I'm allowed to reject it without rejecting medical science. You aren't allowed to read anything outside a narrow comfort zone, evidently. There's mountains of it available now. America has rejected the boosters. Despite desperate sales pitches. Last i saw was 18% compliance on boosters. So, U.S. is up to 82% morons? Nothing more to it?

[President Bush]

Trump is rehearsing his prison skills...

https://www.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/co ... action_bar

[Meadmaker]

I remember Wildcat. If it's the same Wildcat, we exchanged some interesting words some years back about guns.

I'm yapping back and forth with him over at SkepticalCommunity. The latest exchanges have been my insisting that voter fraud theory fails because, like all conspiracy theories, it requires too many people to prevent squealing and exposing the conspiracy. He says it's quite easy.

They're a weird bunch over there. It's much more active than here, but with really not a lot more participants, and some of them are crazy.

[Meadmaker]

The problem is, normal polling isn't matched to life in 2024, when almost no young voters answer calls from people they don't know, and that's in spades for young chicks, so the pollsters have missed Kamala's most-overwhelming support and that's where she's going to wipe the floor with the crook.

Polling really hasn't actually been polling for several election cycles, but the problem has gotten worse.

You don't just ask people and count how many said yes. Now, pollsters try to select people based on a demographic model, and then they get answers from the few people who answer their phones, and then they try to fit that to a model based on previous elections or other data, and extrapolate a predicted results from available data.

I predicted tonight, over at SC, that I think Trump will win. I hope I'm wrong. It's not based on scientific data or anything like that. It's just a hunch based on what I hear people saying and the tone that I see from various supporters.