ISF Dead...

Start here
User avatar
President Bush
Posts: 704
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 3:05 am

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by President Bush »

stanky wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:01 pm Funny, I can't remember why i was banned there.
Maybe they're ready to reconsider?
You got banned twice, for talking naughty, and being me.

Like TA said, you could probably start over there again as a new guy.

¨Justin Case¨, ¨Guadalajara Facelift¨, maybe ¨President Trump¨ ... all good.
User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 843
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:42 am

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by Admin »

arthwollipot wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:10 pmIcerat, by his own account, was experiencing some considerable personal issues for the last few years.
7 years? Must have broken a mirror.

It didn't stop him posting on Twitter flat out.
arthwollipot wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:10 pmThe timing of his return to the forum could be considered suspicious...
Just a little.
User avatar
arthwollipot
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:20 pm

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by arthwollipot »

Admin wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 9:50 am Just a little.
I understand your cynicism, but I think Icerat is doing a good thing right now.
If you're not on edge, you're taking up too much space.
stanky
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:33 am

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by stanky »

Maybe if they knew i've changed?
Forgiveness is divine, i've heard.
I can barely muster an unclean thought.

(curious if there's an "endangered species celebrity bestiality" thread.)
User avatar
arthwollipot
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:20 pm

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by arthwollipot »

There has indeed been a discussion about amnesty for banned posters. Alas, the consensus has gone against the idea, once again.
If you're not on edge, you're taking up too much space.
User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 843
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:42 am

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by Admin »

arthwollipot wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 11:00 pmI understand your cynicism, but I think Icerat is doing a good thing right now.
My jury remains out.

I see a bloke who's just said that he lost his business and income due to long covid illness. At the same time, a convenient idiot starts a thread that results in people saying they'd put money towards the forum to help it thrive.

If it hadn't been me started that thread I'd be calling stooge - the timing was impeccable and he now has a tidy little sum to go on with. And as for changing to XYZ 3.13, nobody will know if that even happens. The actual changes made to date have been emptying a few caches and adding https, which as I pointed out, is free.
User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 843
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:42 am

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by Admin »

arthwollipot wrote: Mon Jan 15, 2024 9:46 pm There has indeed been a discussion about amnesty for banned posters. Alas, the consensus has gone against the idea, once again.
I was going to answer that next.

Stanky, a sockpuppet is your only chance, but given your posting style I suspect you'll be caught in short order.
User avatar
arthwollipot
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:20 pm

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by arthwollipot »

Back when I was a mod, I was advised that the admin team had methods of detecting socks other than a simple IP address match. I wouldn't recommend it.
If you're not on edge, you're taking up too much space.
User avatar
President Bush
Posts: 704
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 3:05 am

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by President Bush »

I say go for it if you want to, stanky. They need you over there.
User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 843
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:42 am

Re: ISF Dead...

Post by Admin »

arthwollipot wrote: Mon Jan 15, 2024 9:52 pm Back when I was a mod, I was advised that the admin team had methods of detecting socks other than a simple IP address match. I wouldn't recommend it.
What's the worst that could happen? He gets banned again - no loss at all.
Post Reply