recogitare.com

Admin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 4:50 pm

stanky wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 6:01 am quarky says Happy Halloween to any there who knew him.

The wee problem with that is that to say so at ISF is a bannable breach of the rules.

Stupid, but true.

Thank god the Kiwi attraction to Halloween is drying up as we do Diwali instead in late October.

That's crazy strict. Shunned for even mentioning the exiled.
I recall a photo of my daughter with her daughter as a baby; daughter's back covered in a beautiful tattoo, and the picture being banned because i was.

arthwollipot wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 10:29 pm Technically but halloween greetings are not the purpose of that particular rule and I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be enforced.

I'm sure it depends on who does it, too.

stanky wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:10 pm That's crazy strict. Shunned for even mentioning the exiled.

Not quite correct,

You can be mentioned, which I've done several times, but passing on a message from you is viewed as attempting to get around the ban and also a bannable offence.

stanky wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:10 pmI recall a photo of my daughter with her daughter as a baby; daughter's back covered in a beautiful tattoo, and the picture being banned because i was.

Yeah, and it got Pres banned as well. Not the best thought-out plan.

I don't remember a time when someone was banned for passing holiday messages from a banned person.

Intent matters. If you're basically arguing by proxy on someone's behalf, that's not on. But banned people are mentioned all the time.

Feedback for the "reaction" feature - also known as "likes"
So far it seems that most responders are saying to leave it as is.

arthwollipot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:22 am I don't remember a time when someone was banned for passing holiday messages from a banned person.

Trust me - I have asked the question and was told that's exactly what would happen. Feel free to have a go - you might get away with it.

arthwollipot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 9:01 pm Feedback for the "reaction" feature - also known as "likes"
So far it seems that most responders are saying to leave it as is.

Goodo.

Admin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 11:45 pm

arthwollipot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:22 am I don't remember a time when someone was banned for passing holiday messages from a banned person.

Trust me - I have asked the question and was told that's exactly what would happen. Feel free to have a go - you might get away with it.

https://internationalskeptics.com/forum ... t-14432314

Admin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 11:45 pm

arthwollipot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:22 am I don't remember a time when someone was banned for passing holiday messages from a banned person.

Trust me - I have asked the question and was told that's exactly what would happen. Feel free to have a go - you might get away with it.

To be fair, you had a bit of a rep back in the day.

With the new software over at ISF, it looks like there is no public "active member" count.

Still, it looks like it's doing ok. It's doing well enough that I've decided not to ask for my membership back again. I think I would get sucked in. Self control isn't my long suit, apparently.

I've been chatting a bunch over at SkepticalCommunity though. That's......interesting.