Re: Weather
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:56 pm
What should be troubling to us all is how easily we can be subverted.
We've trained ourselves to see affirmations and justification in the path we've taken.
It helps to focus on the warts of others in the quest for personal beauty.
Look at me and TA, about to sling degrading insults over the vaccine booster.
Like we're in opposing armies now. Enemies. It's fairly absurd, being as we're all basically 99% in agreement about everything.
a debate with mudslinging is fine.
but it won't be much fun until we catch up with the news...and hear from those who were censored early on...and have transparency with the drug companies.
Why does the CDC recommend the new booster for healthy babies, less than one year old?
What kind of money does this new territory add up to?
What donations went to what politician when, and why can't we get Canada's prices in the U.S.?
Does nothing stink about this? Without any Alex Jones flavor??
How long before we're allowed to officially acknowledge the obvious source of the virus?
And the ones likely to follow?
How to break the corrupting alliance of science, politics and money?
Remove the profit motive from health?
Face it, we only know what we learn from reading or hearing what we choose to hone in on. There is no 'factual' data. No trustworthy news sites.
What there IS is deliberate effort to silence dissenting views. That's what caught my eye...information not forthcoming; collusion of government and social media to shape the outflow of data. Any negative report, squelched. Cheer-leading the vaccine and demonizing the doubters became policy.
Not science.
The actual science that piqued my curiosity was from virologists. To them, the lab leak hypothesis was obvious and even left its 'markers' in the virus...a type that was being studied and manipulated at that Wuhan lab for the twin purposes of salvation and destruction.
That's another can of worms...bio-weapons.
Officially banned. By good countries, like us.
But bad countries may try to use them. So we have to know what they would likely be and create vaccines and antidotes.
later
We've trained ourselves to see affirmations and justification in the path we've taken.
It helps to focus on the warts of others in the quest for personal beauty.
Look at me and TA, about to sling degrading insults over the vaccine booster.
Like we're in opposing armies now. Enemies. It's fairly absurd, being as we're all basically 99% in agreement about everything.
a debate with mudslinging is fine.
but it won't be much fun until we catch up with the news...and hear from those who were censored early on...and have transparency with the drug companies.
Why does the CDC recommend the new booster for healthy babies, less than one year old?
What kind of money does this new territory add up to?
What donations went to what politician when, and why can't we get Canada's prices in the U.S.?
Does nothing stink about this? Without any Alex Jones flavor??
How long before we're allowed to officially acknowledge the obvious source of the virus?
And the ones likely to follow?
How to break the corrupting alliance of science, politics and money?
Remove the profit motive from health?
Face it, we only know what we learn from reading or hearing what we choose to hone in on. There is no 'factual' data. No trustworthy news sites.
What there IS is deliberate effort to silence dissenting views. That's what caught my eye...information not forthcoming; collusion of government and social media to shape the outflow of data. Any negative report, squelched. Cheer-leading the vaccine and demonizing the doubters became policy.
Not science.
The actual science that piqued my curiosity was from virologists. To them, the lab leak hypothesis was obvious and even left its 'markers' in the virus...a type that was being studied and manipulated at that Wuhan lab for the twin purposes of salvation and destruction.
That's another can of worms...bio-weapons.
Officially banned. By good countries, like us.
But bad countries may try to use them. So we have to know what they would likely be and create vaccines and antidotes.
later