well, it IS an option.Admin wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 10:20 amThe point is, if there was no school, the vast majority of parents would be unable to cope with home schooling and it would be an abject disaster.Meadmaker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:59 amIn all seriousness, it's true that there are some great coutcomes for people who eschew traditional education for their kids in favor of homeschooling or even more unorthodox ways of raising and educating children. It's also true that there are kids who are homeschooled, and end up ignorant and unemployable at anything beyond menial labor..
2/3 of kids in America have both parents working. The idea that home schooling is an option is simple absurdity.
What i find absurd is that Americans find themselves in this situation...wherein both parents must work to make ends meet.
Somehow, we let this happen, with barely a whisper of regret. Wasn't always so. (Like when i was a kid)
So, what changed?
We got sold a consumerism nightmare, disguised as convienence and more freedom. Even though families got smaller, houses doubled in size. Cars got more efficient, but suddenly, a family needs two or more. For the extra freedom.
Banks played along. Loans for small homes? Not worth it. Zoning laws played along. HOA's drive the spike in deeper.
It's as if we never noticed this happening. And now, even in educated circles (like here?) the consensus seems to be that alternative approaches are ridiculous. One must fall in line; eschew eccentric ambitions; be realistic...
A notable exception to both parents working (in the U.S.) and the flip side of what i'm describing, are single parent households. Absent the fathers, mostly.
We desperately need alternatives like co-parenting of non-married folks; sharing bloated houses with other small families; ways to be less enslaved. We need to make sure that creative people aren't taken out of the equation; that habitat is possible, as if they're an endangered species.
Otherwise, TA's last sentence above could become true, and not simple hyperbole.