recogitare.com

Unfortunately, there was no such reference, no evaluation, no defense, no analysis, pretty much nothing concerning Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP". Well, there are quite a few quotes of Thomas' words from ...

How do you like this response I induced from ChatGPT? Why did Justice Thomas criticize Brown vs board of education ChatGPT Justice Clarence Thomas has criticized the landmark Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled against racial segregation in public schools, for a few reasons....

(Preface: I present the following because of my interest in chatGPT. My dispute with PresidentBush has gone off into the silly weeds, so I don't think I'll be talking about it much more, unless he posts something particularly interesting, or silly.) I thought I would try another chatGPT experiment....

Quickly googling the subject of Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP". Google is so 20th century. What does Clarence Thomas believe about Brown v. Board of Education? ChatGPT Clarence Thomas, an Associate Justic...

Can you link a media article that has an entirely different take on Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP"? I can't resist a challenge. It will be difficult, though. You see, it will be hard to find an article th...

Quickly googling the subject of Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP". https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clarence-thomas-takes-aim-judicial-power-landmark-brown-v-board-education-decision https://www.theroot.com/c...

I think he would be more offended about being informed that he criticized the landmark ruling that got him his job. Brown vs Board of Education got Justice Thomas his job? What a bizarre thing to say and even more so to suggest that's how Thomas would regard things. As a judge he has attacked the i...

I kind of doubt Justice Thomas would appreciate somebody claiming he said that. On the other hand, maybe he'd like being the subject of a story for children. I think he would be more offended about being informed that he criticized the landmark ruling that got him his job. Brown vs Board of Educati...

What do you think what Justice Thomas said means? It means: 1. Racial discrimination is unconstitutional. 2. As a practical matter, as an immediate goal in 1955, it may not be practical to demand immediate racial desegregation. 3. Because there will be a "reluctance" to actually achieve r...

happy 83rd, Bob...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpbOBExuytQ