recogitare.com

But one question that may be relevant is to what extent Brown demanded the things that Thomas criticizes. Thomas opposes actions that have been taken by courts, and that used Brown as justification. The Bar Association article emphasizes the "integrationist approach" that Thomas has critic...

It has been puzzling. I have been willing to show you where/how you've been misconstruing things but, in reply, you edit out the relevant parts. Perhaps you are just trolling?I' I'm not really a fan of the forum mode that is to post huge volumes of information, and then whine that someone doesn't r...

As per Clarence T., do we think he has any depth of character? Principles? Does the supreme court get points for progressiveness by way of a negro like him? We're toyed with by way of our innate primitive feelings. we struggle to dislike Clarence for being a white supremacist, because he's black. h...

stanky wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2024 3:51 am how about Taurus?

Oh man. You aren't even pretending to hide your Scorpio privilege.

Look, Meadmaker, another meme! ... It soon becomes clear, however, that Thomas's real target is not the lower court, but one of the landmark decisions of the Court on which Thomas now sits: the 1954 opinion issued in Brown v. Board of Education. {snipped) https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/vi...

That was insightful. But I wanted to ask Chat GPT again what its interpretation of the situation was... did Justice Clarence Thomas disparage Brown vs the Board of Education in his concurring opinion to Alexander vs South Carolina NAACP? ChatGPT In his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South...

Unfortunately, there was no such reference, no evaluation, no defense, no analysis, pretty much nothing concerning Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP". Well, there are quite a few quotes of Thomas' words from ...

How do you like this response I induced from ChatGPT? Fascinating. And once again, chatGPT's response is mostly accurate. If the headline you picked as your last example is misleading and/or stupid... why can't you just link to a countervailing example, a media article that has an entirely differen...

(Preface: I present the following because of my interest in chatGPT. My dispute with PresidentBush has gone off into the silly weeds, so I don't think I'll be talking about it much more, unless he posts something particularly interesting, or silly.) I thought I would try another chatGPT experiment. ...

Quickly googling the subject of Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP". Google is so 20th century. What does Clarence Thomas believe about Brown v. Board of Education? ChatGPT Clarence Thomas, an Associate Justic...