recogitare.com

That was insightful. But I wanted to ask Chat GPT again what its interpretation of the situation was... did Justice Clarence Thomas disparage Brown vs the Board of Education in his concurring opinion to Alexander vs South Carolina NAACP? ChatGPT In his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South...

Unfortunately, there was no such reference, no evaluation, no defense, no analysis, pretty much nothing concerning Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP". Well, there are quite a few quotes of Thomas' words from ...

How do you like this response I induced from ChatGPT? Fascinating. And once again, chatGPT's response is mostly accurate. If the headline you picked as your last example is misleading and/or stupid... why can't you just link to a countervailing example, a media article that has an entirely differen...

(Preface: I present the following because of my interest in chatGPT. My dispute with PresidentBush has gone off into the silly weeds, so I don't think I'll be talking about it much more, unless he posts something particularly interesting, or silly.) I thought I would try another chatGPT experiment. ...

Quickly googling the subject of Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP". Google is so 20th century. What does Clarence Thomas believe about Brown v. Board of Education? ChatGPT Clarence Thomas, an Associate Justic...

Can you link a media article that has an entirely different take on Justice Thomas' language from his concurring opinion in "Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP"? I can't resist a challenge. It will be difficult, though. You see, it will be hard to find an article th...

I kind of doubt Justice Thomas would appreciate somebody claiming he said that. On the other hand, maybe he'd like being the subject of a story for children. I think he would be more offended about being informed that he criticized the landmark ruling that got him his job. Brown vs Board of Educati...

I kind of doubt Justice Thomas would appreciate somebody claiming he said that. On the other hand, maybe he'd like being the subject of a story for children. I think he would be more offended about being informed that he criticized the landmark ruling that got him his job. However, we'll never know...

Meanwhile, if you really want to find an All-American hobby, look at lawsuits. Families of children killed in the Uvalde, Texas, massacre are suing, Facebook (i.e. Meta), the company that manufactures the AR 15, and the makers of "Call of Duty". I don't see a courtroom victory in their fut...

What do you think what Justice Thomas said means? It means: 1. Racial discrimination is unconstitutional. 2. As a practical matter, as an immediate goal in 1955, it may not be practical to demand immediate racial desegregation. 3. Because there will be a "reluctance" to actually achieve r...